I don’t receive many requests to add additional information to what is already on offer but after a couple of
days of thought I decided in this case to relent.
The request was simply to add the number of runs that the C&D rating is referencing. This makes perfect sense and I
am sure that from a laying perspective layers would be happier playing a horse
that had consistently run poorly over C&D as opposed referencing a single race.
|
4:00
Book Hospitality In Horizons Handicap (Div I) Cl4 7f32y
|
||||
|
101.4%
|
|
Fred
Willetts
|
99.2%
|
(2)
|
|
101.3%
|
|
Restaurateur
|
100.2%
|
(2)
|
|
101.2%
|
|
Summerinthecity
|
|
|
|
101.1%
|
|
Albaqaa
|
|
|
|
100.9%
|
|
Fathsta
|
100.1%
|
(1)
|
|
100.9%
|
*
|
Cockney Dancer
|
100.8%
|
(1)
|
|
100.7%
|
|
Dubai
Hills
|
101.1%
|
(1)
|
|
100.6%
|
|
Showboating
|
|
|
|
100.5%
|
|
Jungle
Bay
|
99.9%
|
(1)
|
|
99.7%
|
|
Divine
Call
|
|
|
|
99.5%
|
|
Lucky
Dan
|
99.2%
|
(5)
|
|
98.8%
|
|
Fabled
City
|
|
|
In the example above we
have the figures as published last night but going forward I will also be publishing the additional bracketed
figure denoting the number of runs over C&D.
In hindsight you may feel that
Fred Willetts would be a good lay proposition as the figures would suggest this
is not a favorable C&D.
Having looked at the trading prices you would have to be a
brave man unless you made the lay early and backed at SP but you get the idea.
I hope this will be beneficial to more than the individual
who made the request.
.jpg)