Being more resilient than most when shrugging of losers I am
surprised to find that a race from Mondays Southwell card is still playing on
my mind. Four days have lapsed since and even Wednesday’s very profitable day hasn't
removed the feeling that something needs to be addressed in the Sport of Kings.
The race in question was the Southwell 16:00 where I had
provided subscribers with Constant Dream as a selection the evening before at
11-1. The weight of market support saw Constant Dream vying for favouritism at
various stages during the morning and I am sure that this would be the horse
that bookmakers wanted beaten.
As they swung off the last bend market rival Hidden Asset
ridden by A Mullen, intentionally, in my opinion tightened up Constant Dream
who was prominent enough to be in Mullen’s peripheral vision at minimum. Not so
much as a look over the shoulder by Mullen as this would have only acted as
proof of his awareness.
Hidden Asset then faded in the straight to be a poor third
while Constant Dream after regaining its momentum chased home the winner Fossa going
down by ¾ length. There was no doubt that the momentum lost cost Constant Dream
far more than ¾ length and on that basis believe that the selection would have
won.
Here lies the problem: If Mullen had been found guilty of
reckless riding he would face a couple of day’s suspension, and as the horse
hampered finished in front of the horse that caused the interference the result
would stand. The issue I have is that jockeys can ride with
reckless abandon knowing that in the vast majority of cases the finishing order
will remain unaltered regardless of the means used to achieve their position.
I am not suggesting that bookmakers might ask favours of
jockeys to hinder a rival but the rules of racing as they stand would allow for
it. In this case it was probably no more than Mullen trying to get a march on a
market rival by intentionally hindering its progress which many might view as tactically
astute. I ask you to look at the picture in this article, bearing in mind that Constant Dream was little more than a head behind Hidden Asset at the time of the interference and reassess! (G.Lee - Constant Dream - light blue and black)
Me, I would rather adopt rules similar to those in operation
in America where the horse causing the interference is automatically thrown
out. This would add to the safety of the sport, help to stop any behind the
scenes malpractices and we would see fairer results to races.
No comments:
Post a Comment